![]() Still, you should be able to go a bit farther in the 2023 Mazda CX-50 on a single tank of gas, since it is equipped with a slightly larger fuel tank than the CX-5, at 15.9 gallons compared to 15.3 gallons. These Mazda crossover SUVs are equally efficient, both returning an EPA-estimated 24 city and 30 highway MPG rating. CX-50 MPG ratings when comparably equipped with the Skyactiv-G non-turbo 2.5-liter engine. There’s no difference in the Mazda CX-5 vs. ![]() ![]() CX-50 towing capacity with the standard naturally aspirated 2.5-liter engine, we find that both SUVs are rated to tow up to 2,000 pounds.Īs expected, peak fuel economy comes with their naturally aspirated engines. A responsive and smooth-shifting Skyactiv-Drive six-speed automatic transmission and proactive i-Activ AWD system are also standard equipment.Ĭomparing the Mazda CX-5 vs. Mazda CX-50 SpecsĪ 2.5-liter Skyactiv-G inline four-cylinder engine powers the new Mazda CX-50 and CX-5 SUVs, producing 187 horsepower and 186 pound-feet of torque in both models. You’ll find most other elements of the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 models remain the same for 2024. The 2024 Mazda CX-5 changes include the new CX-5 Carbon Turbo trim, highlighted by a Zircon Sand Metallic exterior matched with a Terracotta leather interior. However, the aging Mazda CX-5 offers the greatest changes for the new year, with the addition of a new trim level, complete with a distinctive exterior and interior color combination. Both of these SUVs are largely carryover models for 2024, with only subtle tweaks made to their lineups. CX-5įirst things first, we should cover the latest updates and upgrades for these Mazda models. Stick around until the end to find out which Mazda compact crossover SUV we prefer and why. That way, if you’re shopping for a compact SUV like these two Mazda models, you’ll have an easier time selecting your favorite. CX-50 in key areas like size and dimensions, engine specs and performance, design elements, interior technologies, and safety systems. But the closer you look, it becomes clearer that both models offer distinctive character - and why both of these compact CUVs should continue to be sold alongside each other in Mazda’s lineup well into the future. CX-50.Īt first glance, it might seem like there’s not much separating these two Mazda compact crossover SUVs. See also: Reports Have the Civic's 2.Choosing between Mazda’s two compact SUV models can be challenging, since both offer benefits, so that’s why we’ve compiled a detailed comparison review of the CX-5 vs. See also: Honda Partially Unveils 2023 HR-V See also: 2023 Honda HR-V: Honda Fills In the Holes It wouldn't be a bad idea to consider a less luxurious livery in this case. At nearly $40,000, the Honda HR-V Touring is quite an expense. The other negative point is the price of the higher trims in the range. ![]() The new HR-V’s road manners are consequently much more reassuring, while the dashboard is easier to live with on a daily basis.īut, the model’s new sporty vibe has been achieved at the expense of that beloved “magic”rear seat, deemed too conventional we presume. It was starting to age, but it wasn't a bad choice with its reliable mechanics and super-practical interior, thanks to that “magic” rear seat.įor 2023, the crossover changes its platform, as the new variant dumps the architecture of the defunct Fit in favour of the platform underpinning the new-generation Civic. Up until a few months ago, the Honda HR-V was, give or take a few nips and tucks, the same as it was back in 2016.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |